Add "project" and "institution" to the CIM

[murphysj]

WHO: Mark

These properties are currently added manually via pyesdoc but other generation methods (e.g. Questionnaire and ESMF) won't have them in there.

They are required for proper follow-on tool use.

[bnlawrence]

Not sure what these requirements actually are.

• Institution is a form of responsibleparty (party in cim2). In what other way do we need this concept?
• CIM2 has a specific thing called a project , but it only differs in small way from an activity. What was wrong with activity as in CIM1.5 - where experiments could be linked with projects?

[asladeofgreen]

think DRS. think controlled vocabulary. A real-world system needs at the very least to organize document collections by project/activity and institute. Sure for CIM.1 document we can derive a responsible party and activity from a simulation document set, but this is messy and not available for every document. pyesdoc has a simpler solution.

[bnlawrence]

Hi Mark

So what is the simpler solution?

Ta, Bryan

On 20 October 2014 16:29, Mark A. Greenslade notifications@github.com wrote:

think DRS. think controlled vocabulary. A real-world system needs at the very least to organize document collections by project/activity and institute. Sure for CIM.1 document we can derive a responsible party and activity from a simulation document set, but this is messy and not available for every document. pyesdoc has a simpler solution.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/ES-DOC/esdoc-cim/issues/8#issuecomment-59779704.

Bryan Lawrence University of Reading: Professor of Weather and Climate Computing. National Centre for Atmospheric Science: Director of Models and Data. STFC: Director of the Centre for Environmental Data Archival. Ph: +44 118 3786507 or 1235 445012; Web:home.badc.rl.ac.uk/lawrence

[asladeofgreen]

These attributes are part of the DocMetaInfo class associated with each CIM vX class that is considered to be a 'document'.