manderberg
commented
2 years ago Upon further investigation the carma_pmc does not appear to have ever passed the ERC test with either the MCT or NUOPC couplers. The carma_pmc model was tested with ERC in several different combinations of older CAM and CARMA tags with the MCT coupler, but none were successful. In the oldest tags the model failed to build; in more recent tags it failed in the base-restart comparison phase.
What happened?
FAIL ERC_Ln9_Vnuopc.f10_f10_mg37.QPWmaC6.cheyenne_intel.cam-carma_pmc (phase COMPARE_base_rest)
PASS ERS_Ln9_Vnuopc.f10_f10_mg37.QPWmaC6.cheyenne_intel.cam-carma_pmc RUN
What are the steps to reproduce the bug?
In/cime/scripts/ run create_test using test ERC, grid f10_f10_mg37, compset QPWmaC6:
./create_test --test-root --output-root --test-id 20220531-02 --xml-machine cheyenne -p --wait ERC_Ln9_Vnuopc.f10_f10_mg37.QPWmaC6.cheyenne_intel.cam-carma_pmc
What CAM tag were you using?
cam6_3_055 & cam6_3_061
What machine were you running CAM on?
CISL machine (e.g. cheyenne)
What compiler were you using?
Intel, Other (please specify below)
Path to a case directory, if applicable
/glade/work/mlander/cam6_3_061-carma4_00-pmc/ERC_Ln9_Vnuopc.f10_f10_mg37.QPWmaC6.cheyenne_intel.cam-carma_pmc.20220531-01
Will you be addressing this bug yourself?
No
Extra info
I also tested carma_pmc with ERC on izumi in tag cam6_3_062 with the GNU and NAG compilers, and observed the same failure. /home/mlander/input_dir/ERC_Ln9_Vnuopc.f10_f10_mg37.QPWmaC6.izumi_gnu.cam-carma_pmc.20220531-01 /home/mlander/input_dir/ERC_Ln9_Vnuopc.f10_f10_mg37.QPWmaC6.izumi_nag.cam-carma_pmc.20220531-01
The ERS regression tests on carma_pmc in tag cam6_3_062 with the GNU and NAG compilers passed.