Closed ligiabernardet closed 3 years ago
@gold2718 @climbfuji @dudhia
Adding @mattldawson as he pointed out the inconsistency initially.
Maybe some separation of microphysics, radiation, and soil paragraphs could be done.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 2:11 PM ligiabernardet @.***> wrote:
@.**** commented on this pull request.
In StandardNamesRules.rst https://github.com/ESCOMP/CCPPStandardNames/pull/16#discussion_r680193839 :
@@ -56,6 +56,15 @@ CCPP Standard Name Rules representing quantities at the interface between grid cells vertically, use at_interface.
+#. By default, mixing_ratio refers to mass mixing ratios. Volume mixing ratios should be
- qualified as volume_mixing_ratio. Mass mixing ratios should contain information regarding
Volume mixing ratio appear for chemical compositions, and are important in radiation parameterizations. We already have several standard names that start with volume_mixing_ratio (of co2, n2o, ch4, etc.). So, I think this sentence is needed.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ESCOMP/CCPPStandardNames/pull/16#discussion_r680193839, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEIZ77HD6H4ADQSX6F3ACJLT2MBO7ANCNFSM5BI75A4Q .
Regarding @gold2718 's comment about number concentration, we can indeed clarify this in the rules. We likely want _number_concentration_ofX, to match CF conventions. For number concentration, per unit of volume (m-3) is the default and if the quantity is per unit of mass (kg -1), a qualifier must be used: _mass_numberconcentration.
All comments have been addressed in the last update. @dudhia @gold2718 Please take a look.
In these PR I clarified the use of (mass and volume) mixing ratios, as well as the representation of soil moisture. These clarifications are meant to address comments submitted during the review of https://github.com/ESCOMP/CCPPStandardNames/pull/13.