Closed billsacks closed 2 years ago
Thanks for the catch, @whlipscomb ! I think it should work right now, but please let me know if you see any other issues.
Here is a sample of the output (when I checked the output with the buggy code, there were only 4 rows for each variable, because it was effectively using jtest = 1 instead of jtest = 16):
112:
112: adjust thck: itest, jtest, rank = 3 16 112
112:
112: Before thck adjustment, usrf (m):
112: 277.562 356.353 457.771 530.058 615.079 672.004
112: 199.529 275.884 401.627 466.389 557.691 636.234
112: 142.300 191.138 310.010 426.479 522.109 609.718
112: 76.492 143.198 202.430 370.188 469.461 560.776
112: 55.183 95.793 151.730 294.327 412.291 525.256
112: 51.500 94.954 120.261 247.587 384.764 499.527
112: 34.596 117.300 188.208 238.145 364.252 483.843
112:
112: Before thck adjustment, thck (m):
112: 991.011 1045.217 1156.221 1325.497 1418.595 1468.612
112: 889.430 948.456 1157.434 1276.198 1291.437 1358.095
112: 786.833 937.032 1066.448 1145.403 1219.621 1400.691
112: 741.803 959.238 968.295 1026.165 1186.926 1437.509
112: 519.488 851.641 923.829 1091.538 1248.260 1505.987
112: 479.061 886.538 1126.097 1110.270 1280.644 1503.819
112: 290.632 919.017 1214.570 1235.027 1405.126 1367.522
112:
112: Before thck adjustment, topg (m):
112: -713.449 -688.865 -698.450 -795.439 -803.517 -796.608
112: -689.902 -672.572 -755.808 -809.810 -733.745 -721.861
112: -644.533 -745.894 -756.438 -718.924 -697.512 -790.974
112: -673.384 -818.485 -765.865 -655.977 -717.464 -876.732
112: -810.546 -899.029 -776.111 -797.210 -835.969 -980.731
112: -970.441 -928.659 -1013.923 -862.995 -895.880 -1004.292
112: -789.503 -820.322 -1026.362 -996.882 -1040.874 -883.679
112:
112: Before thck adjustment, cavity thickness (m):
112: 0.000 0.000 0.000 -0.000 -0.000 0.000
112: -0.000 -0.000 0.000 0.000 -0.000 -0.000
112: -0.000 0.000 -0.000 -0.000 0.000 0.000
112: 8.073 2.445 0.000 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
112: 346.241 143.181 4.012 0.000 -0.000 -0.000
112: 542.881 137.075 8.087 0.312 0.000 -0.000
112: 533.466 18.605 0.000 0.000 -0.000 0.000
I have run 3 CESM-CISM debug tests that were failing before (all with Antarctica); they now pass.
@whlipscomb I'll merge this once you approve.