ESCOMP / CTSM

Community Terrestrial Systems Model (includes the Community Land Model of CESM)
http://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm2.0/land/
Other
302 stars 307 forks source link

ctsm5.2.005 release note should be changed #2775

Open samsrabin opened 1 day ago

samsrabin commented 1 day ago

It should focus on the stuff in 5.2, not the stuff from 5.2.001-005.

wwieder commented 1 day ago

Yes. I thought that was the plan, focus on what's new in 5.2 (and if needed a note about the namelist updates that went into 001-005.

samsrabin commented 15 hours ago

How about this, from the 5.2.0 tag annotation (slightly modified)?


CTSM 5.2: New surface datasets and mksurfdata_esmf tool to create them

New surface datasets

The new surface datasets are incompatible with previous versions (for example the ctsm5.1 series)—ctsm5.2.0 and following versions can NOT use the previous ctsm5.1 datasets, and vice versa.

See the section below about the new datasets used in their creation. Improvements in how landunits on coastal areas were also made.

Fields added to the surface datasets in ctsm5.2:

Fields removed from the surface datasets in ctsm5.2:

New input data used for making surface datasets

New mksurfdata_esmf Tool

mksurfdata_esmf is a parallel version of mksurfdata that uses ESMF regridding directly so that offline mapping files don't have to be created as a separate step. This allows surface datasets to be created at much higher resolutions.

The build for the tool is based on the CESM/CIME build system and uses cmake. This allows the build to be kept up with changes in CESM. Currently it's only setup and working on Derecho, but this design will enable it to be built and run on any CESM-supported machine (or a machine that a user ports to).

Any input grid from ccs_config can be used, or the user can supply their own mesh file to define the output grid. The user no longer has to add to the list of valid resolutions (as in the now-deprecated mksurfdata_map).

Creation of supported single point datasets. These datasets are created through the use of subset_data.

Test datasets for dynUrban, dynLake, and dynPFT is done with a simple NCO script.

All datasets can be easily made by running make all in the tools/mksurfdata_esmf/ directory.

For detailed instructions, see tools/mksurfdata_esmf/README.md.

ekluzek commented 15 hours ago

@samsrabin thanks for pointing this out. You are right, to make these development release tags useful, we need to summarize the changes from the previous development release tag. So in this case primarily it would be ctsm5.2.0 notes. In looking at ctsm5.2.0 to ctsm5.2.005 changes it's primarily fixes needed to get ctsm5.2.0 functioning the way it was needed. One update worth mentioning is the regional and mesh file creation that went into ctsm5.2.003. You could mention the addition of 1979 and 1979-2026 datasets that went into ctsm5.2.004.

samsrabin commented 14 hours ago

Okay, how about this? Bold is new.


CTSM 5.2: New surface datasets and mksurfdata_esmf tool to create them

New surface datasets

The new surface datasets are incompatible with previous versions (for example the ctsm5.1 series)—ctsm5.2.0 and following versions can NOT use the previous ctsm5.1 datasets, and vice versa.

See the section below about the new datasets used in their creation. Improvements in how landunits on coastal areas were also made.

Fields added to the surface datasets in ctsm5.2:

Fields removed from the surface datasets in ctsm5.2:

New input data used for making surface datasets

New mksurfdata_esmf Tool

mksurfdata_esmf is a parallel version of mksurfdata that uses ESMF regridding directly so that offline mapping files don't have to be created as a separate step. This allows surface datasets to be created at much higher resolutions.

The build for the tool is based on the CESM/CIME build system and uses cmake. This allows the build to be kept up with changes in CESM. Currently it's only setup and working on Derecho, but this design will enable it to be built and run on any CESM-supported machine (or a machine that a user ports to).

Any input grid from ccs_config can be used, or the user can supply their own mesh file to define the output grid. The user no longer has to add to the list of valid resolutions (as in the now-deprecated mksurfdata_map).

Creation of supported single point datasets. These datasets are created through the use of subset_data.

Test datasets for dynUrban, dynLake, and dynPFT is done with a simple NCO script.

All datasets can be easily made by running make all in the tools/mksurfdata_esmf/ directory.

For detailed instructions, see tools/mksurfdata_esmf/README.md.

ekluzek commented 14 hours ago

I like this as a framework though for documenting what we think is the best scientifically stable and tested version to use. This means the process is something like this:

Loop: Over the following till done...

Whatever is then made the development release tag for that minor version includes a description that summarizes changes since the previous development release tag.

So for example, I expect something like this to happen with ctsm5.3.0:

  1. ctsm5.3.0 is created, but NOT marked as a release
  2. We fix some issues in follow on ctsm5.3.001 and following tags
  3. We get a tag with updated IC files that we do release testing on and have simulations that correspond to it
  4. That tag is say ctsm5.3.007 -- we mark that as a release
  5. The release notes describe the changes from ctsm5.2.005 until ctsm5.3.007
  6. We'd leave ctsm5.3.007 as a release unless we find an important scientific problem with it -- if we did we'd delete it as a release (the DOI stays though). And we'd make a new tag that we mark as the ctsm5.3 development release tag (say ctsm5.3.21). The description for ctsm5.3.21 would then be changes from ctsm5.2.005 until ctsm5.3.21.

The idea then is that scientists would use ctsm5.3.007 as the recommended "last stable" vetted tag to use for their scientific development. It has a DOI associated with it, so it can be used for publications. Starting with the last development release tag will make it easier for everyone to bring those changes into CTSM main development.

Thoughts on that process outlined above everyone? @samsrabin @wwieder @adrifoster @slevis-lmwg @olyson We'll also talk about this next Thursday...

samsrabin commented 9 hours ago

Yep, that's pretty much what I was thinking too! We could also mark ctsm5.3.0 as a pre-release, if we wanted, as long as that would still generate a DOI.