Closed jyucsiro closed 4 years ago
Could the following
:Conventions a rdf:Property ;
rdfs:label "Conventions" ;
rdfs:seeAlso "<http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Attribute_Convention_for_Data_Discovery_1-3#Conventions>" ;
:status "Highly Recommended" ;
j.0:description "A comma-separated list of the conventions that are followed by the dataset. For files that follow this version of ACDD, include the string 'ACDD-1.3'. (This attribute is described in the NetCDF Users Guide.)" ;
j.0:identifier "Conventions" .
use nug:Conventions instead?
Could the following
:Conventions a rdf:Property ; rdfs:label "Conventions" ; rdfs:seeAlso "<http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Attribute_Convention_for_Data_Discovery_1-3#Conventions>" ; :status "Highly Recommended" ; j.0:description "A comma-separated list of the conventions that are followed by the dataset. For files that follow this version of ACDD, include the string 'ACDD-1.3'. (This attribute is described in the NetCDF Users Guide.)" ; j.0:identifier "Conventions" .
use nug:Conventions instead?
I think this would be useful.
I think that the netCDF User Guide is defined outside ACDD. It would be good if the resource reflected this, and ACDD was just adding a recommendation
These semantics could be captured differently by having a resource that was the ACDD recommendations, which made statements about individual resources, e.g.
:ACDDRecommendations
acddv:highlyRecommended http://somewhere.unidata.edu/NUG/Conventions ;
acddv:Recommended :acknowledgement ;
This PR provides a CSV formatted version of ACDD 1.3. Descriptions have been taken from this wiki page: http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Attribute_Convention_for_Data_Discovery
A separate 'status' column captures the recommendation level of each attribute name.
See issue #1