This addresses issue #223, and pulls text from our decision document on namespace consistency.
It complements the text in the GETTING-STARTED guide, which now says the same thing but explains it
differently. I also considered just creating a forward reference to GETTING_STARTED, but decided the re-explanation might be useful. Comments and revisions appreciated. You can read the text of the revised section here:
@ashepherd unless I hear otherwise from you, I'll plan to merge this tomorrow given the feedback from @datadavev. Then we'll be ready for a final review during Monday's meeting.
This addresses issue #223, and pulls text from our decision document on namespace consistency. It complements the text in the GETTING-STARTED guide, which now says the same thing but explains it differently. I also considered just creating a forward reference to GETTING_STARTED, but decided the re-explanation might be useful. Comments and revisions appreciated. You can read the text of the revised section here:
https://github.com/ESIPFed/science-on-schema.org/blob/223-fix-namespace-in-conventions/CONVENTIONS.md#syntax-namespace