search

ESIPFed / sweet

Official repository for Semantic Web for Earth and Environmental Terminology (SWEET) Ontologies
Other
120 stars 34 forks source link

[FEATURE] please add "How to" review section to wiki #242

Open brandonnodnarb opened 3 years ago

brandonnodnarb commented 3 years ago

What is the criteria for a successful PR review?
From a more practical perspective, what are the actual steps?

pbuttigieg commented 3 years ago

We're also noting that some classes, such as estuary have axioms that can be reasoned over. Is there a preferred reasoner to use when checking logic?

pbuttigieg commented 3 years ago

The general guidance should also include an obsolescence workflow (xref #192)

rduerr commented 3 years ago

Group discussion suggests using all reasoners (e.g., elk, pellet, Hermit, Fact).

rduerr commented 3 years ago

Group discussion suggests that the solution to #192 be used in general to deal with obsolescence.