search

ESIPFed / sweet

Official repository for Semantic Web for Earth and Environmental Terminology (SWEET) Ontologies
Other
117 stars 33 forks source link

Include ontology metadata to release #54

Open dr-shorthair opened 6 years ago

dr-shorthair commented 6 years ago

More ontology metadata could be added to http://sweetontology.net/sweetAll There are a number of best practices.

OMV of course https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/OMV

This from the LOV community http://dgarijo.github.io/Widoco/doc/bestPractices/index-en.html

This from the Agroportal folk http://www.lirmm.fr/~jonquet/publications/documents/Article_MTSR-2017_MOD1.2.pdf

I suggest that owl:versionIRI should point to the GitHub tag, e.g. owl:versionIRI https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet/releases/tag/v3.0.0 ;

charlesvardeman commented 5 years ago

I wanted to start adding some definitions to relmCryo based on the terms being added to ENVO during the cryosphere hackathon. However, I realized there was no agreement within SWEET of how to do that annotation. The most general of these would be from http://dgarijo.github.io/Widoco/doc/bestPractices/index-en.html and probably the most general guidelines and be a good minimum level of annotation (we have used Widoco as it is a pretty good documentation tool). If the community could come to some agreement, could we add that the documentation?

cmungall commented 5 years ago

There is some discussion on how to track provenance/credit on the per-triple level here: https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet/issues/46#issuecomment-454237269

graybeal commented 5 years ago

The existence of the very nice Widoco tool (integratable with COR I wonder?) strongly recommends following as much of the Widoco best practices as we can. Although I have long admired MOD from AgroPortal (http://www.lirmm.fr/~jonquet/publications/documents/Article_MTSR-2017_MOD1.2.pdf as linked above) and would pick the Widoco properties based on what agrees best with MOD.