Closed jedwards4b closed 7 months ago
@jasonb5 Can I assume this is an expected failure until #4563 is merged?
Yes these failures are expected and fixed in #4563.
@jedwards4b what is the criterial for "standalone" in this PR? We have a couple of tests that starting being marked as fail after this PR went in even though they finished fine.
2000_EAM%IDEAL_SLND_SICE_SOCN_SROF_SGLC_SWAV
RCP8_SATM_SLND_SICE_SOCN_SROF_MALI%SIA_SWAV
Although they only test one component, there is still an e3sm.log and cpl.log
standalone component tests do not produce a cpl log file and so looking there for test completion of these components is a mistake. This change will cause case_run.py to look in the component log for the completion stamp and will cause memory and performance baseline comparisons to be skipped since memory and performance data is not collected.
Test suite: cesm2.3.alpha17b Test baseline: Test namelist changes: Test status: bit for bit,
Fixes
User interface changes?:
Update gh-pages html (Y/N)?: