Open mo-gill opened 1 week ago
I have tried using both the current precommit rev (v0.3.2.9007
) and the latest rev (0.4.2
) but both get slightly different variations of the same error
For v0.3.2.9007
:
[INFO] Installing environment for https://github.com/lorenzwalthert/precommit/.
[INFO] Once installed this environment will be reused.
[INFO] This may take a few minutes...
An unexpected error has occurred: CalledProcessError: command: ('<mo-environmentlocation>', '--vanilla', '/var/tmp/tmp0bxucmjx/script.R')
return code: 1
stdout: (none)
stderr:
# Bootstrapping renv 0.16.0 --------------------------------------------------
Warning: unable to access index for repository https://cran.rstudio.com/src/contrib:
cannot open URL 'https://cran.rstudio.com/src/contrib/PACKAGES'
Warning: unable to access index for repository https://cloud.r-project.org/src/contrib:
cannot open URL 'https://cloud.r-project.org/src/contrib/PACKAGES'
* Downloading renv 0.16.0 ... FAILED
Error in bootstrap(version, libpath) : failed to download renv 0.16.0
Calls: source ... eval.parent -> eval -> eval -> eval -> eval -> bootstrap
Execution halted
for 0.4.2
:
most recent:
[INFO] This may take a few minutes...
An unexpected error has occurred: CalledProcessError: command: ('<REDACTED>/esmvaltool-2.9.0-2/bin/Rscript', '--vanilla', '<REDACTED>/script.R')
return code: 1
stdout: (none)
stderr:
# Bootstrapping renv 0.17.3 --------------------------------------------------
Warning: unable to access index for repository https://cran.rstudio.com/src/contrib:
cannot open URL 'https://cran.rstudio.com/src/contrib/PACKAGES'
Warning: unable to access index for repository https://cloud.r-project.org/src/contrib:
cannot open URL 'https://cloud.r-project.org/src/contrib/PACKAGES'
* Downloading renv 0.17.3 ... FAILED
Error in bootstrap(version, libpath) : failed to download renv 0.17.3
Calls: source ... eval.parent -> eval -> eval -> eval -> eval -> bootstrap
Execution halted
Check the log at /<REDACTED>pre-commit.log
I think it may be a MO specific issue related to R so have assigned to @ehogan for the time being as i will be moved onto a different project this week.
This is a MO issue (related to our usual proxy issues) ๐ I will fix this in our community environment, but in the meantime, I will suggest using this branch to all versions in the .pre-commit-config.yaml
file ๐
@ehogan Did you want to synchronize the pins here with those in environment(_osx).yml and optionally those in setup.py for a more consistent experience?
@ehogan Did you want to synchronize the pins here with those in environment(_osx).yml and optionally those in setup.py for a more consistent experience?
This is a tricky question ๐ One of the benefits of pre-commit (in my opinion) is that pre-commit manages its own environments for the versions defined in the pre-commit configuration file (one environment per pre-commit hook, so there are no solving issues), so if everyone installs the pre-commit hooks, everyone will be using the same version. It's true that if someone chose to run, e.g. isort
on the command line (which would use the version installed in the developer's ESMValTool environment) it may behave differently to the pre-commit hook, because the pre-commit version wouldn't necessarily be aligned with the version in the ESMValTool environment, so I agree there is a benefit to aligning the versions. The disadvantages are that if we pinned all the versions in the environment(_osx).yml
file, this may make the environment harder to solve, and we would need to introduce a policy on when we would update the versions (once per release?). There may be other disadvantages I haven't thought of (@valeriupredoi any thoughts?). I would be happy to pin the versions in the environment(_osx).yml
file if others are happy to do so? ๐
It shouldn't be a problem to pin in environment.yml if we update regularly. The thing is that 1) not everybody uses pre-commit and 2) pre-commit doesn't quite manage its own environments, only the Python bits, for e.g. the R linters you're still dependent on whats installed in conda.
It shouldn't be a problem to pin in environment.yml if we update regularly. The thing is that
not everybody uses pre-commit and
pre-commit doesn't quite manage its own environments, only the Python bits, for e.g. the R linters you're still dependent on whats installed in conda.
Ah, true. Ok, I'll do some pinning shortly ๐
It shouldn't be a problem to pin in environment.yml if we update regularly. The thing is that
- not everybody uses pre-commit and
- pre-commit doesn't quite manage its own environments, only the Python bits, for e.g. the R linters you're still dependent on whats installed in conda.
Ah, true. Ok, I'll do some pinning shortly ๐
Now done in 16e4d6adf ๐
I think I broke everything ๐
Description
Closes #3666
Link to documentation:
Before you get started
Checklist
It is the responsibility of the author to make sure the pull request is ready to review. The icons indicate whether the item will be subject to the ๐ Technical or ๐งช Scientific review.
To help with the number of pull requests: