ESPD / ESPD-Service

Other
18 stars 69 forks source link

Promote other ESPD services #149

Closed ec-mcs closed 6 years ago

ec-mcs commented 7 years ago

We had a discussion in the user community of how other ESPD services are being accepted by users. The result is that our service is seen a the legitimate one...

This is the discussion we had Marit Lysemose Thomsen, Mercell: the challenge is that the users expect everything to be like EC's service

Marit Lysemose Thomsen, Mercell: they don't grasp the idea of implementing a data model :-)

Marit Lysemose Thomsen, Mercell: they are afraid not to be in compliance

Marit Lysemose Thomsen, Mercell: some use it

Marit Lysemose Thomsen, Mercell: I have raised this problem on the CEF call

Timo Rantanen / Hansel / Finland: I have the same problem with Finnish users - the think the commision ESPD service is "more" legitimate

Marit Lysemose Thomsen, Mercell: Visma in Sweden have same challenge

Marit Lysemose Thomsen, Mercell: YES!

Timo Rantanen / Hansel / Finland: :-)

Anne Katrine Mortensen: Good idea writing about Mercell aso. But wouldn´t that be advertising on behalf of few specific private firms?

Anne Katrine Mortensen: OK.

Jose Luis Cueva - Spain: OK

Marit Lysemose Thomsen, Mercell: It is not a matter of companies being specifically highlighted, Anne, I agree with that. But the public authirities in the member states do not provide proper information about the ESPD and there is currently a lot of "CMA" actions that DO NOT make life easier for the Eos..

Marit Lysemose Thomsen, Mercell: agree

Anne Katrine Mortensen: But good idea to write that the EU ESPD-site is not the only possibillity.

Anne Katrine Mortensen: Good idea.

Jose Luis Cueva - Spain: "period" type

Anne Katrine Mortensen: Good idea

Timo Rantanen / Hansel / Finland: you need to the correct the bug

Timo Rantanen / Hansel / Finland: before

Anne Katrine Mortensen: Good.

Timo Rantanen / Hansel / Finland: I can add any evidences

Timo Rantanen / Hansel / Finland: No I cannot add evidences

Timo Rantanen / Hansel / Finland: How are the language corrections? have you translated missing parts

Anne Katrine Mortensen: In the Danish version on page one there is text in English.

SELLITTO Giampaolo IT: Directive provides that "art 57. 3. Member States may provide for a derogation from themandatory exclusion provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2, onan exceptional basis, for overriding reasons relating to thepublic interest such as public health or protection of theenvironment."... or when it is disproportioned ... so we can have different value for lots and what is proportioned in one lot is disproportioned for another

SELLITTO Giampaolo IT: so we can have different exclusion vcriteria

SELLITTO Giampaolo IT: for fdifferent lots

Timo Rantanen / Hansel / Finland: Some exclusion grounds are vlountary

Timo Rantanen / Hansel / Finland: Some exclusion grounds are voluntary already is ESPD now.

Jose Luis Cueva - Spain: thanks, bye

Hannah Stephens: thank you

Laura Martin/Steve Patterson/Scottish Government: Bye

Ulf Lotzmnn (UKL): thanks, bye

SELLITTO Giampaolo IT: bye

Michaël De Winne / e-Proc Belgium: bye

Marit Lysemose Thomsen, Mercell: thnx bye

ec-mcs commented 6 years ago

We have to generally think about promoting ESPD services in MS. As this is not an issue for our ESPD service for the time being. I will close it.