Unexpected ligature behavior with sona+tawa(...)

etbcor / nasin-nanpa

nasin sitelen tan anpa nanpa

MIT License

86 stars 3 forks source link

Unexpected ligature behavior with sona+tawa(...) #4

Closed snowkittykira closed 7 months ago

snowkittykira commented 8 months ago

sona+kama (ijo ijo ...) sona+tawa (ijo ijo ...)

I would expect the previous two to both render the second glyph inside of sona, however it seems like the underline takes precedence and pulls tawa out. Is this expected behavior?

etbcor commented 8 months ago

Oh that is rather interesting -- and honestly is not what I would have expected either.

Although now that I'm thinking of it I think that actually makes sense, given the current ordering of lookup tables being used. I'll experiment with adjusting that for 4.0