Remove TestResult from xxxPropertyType

[CharlieG021163]

Related to ##16, #101

MESA

https://github.com/MESAInternational/B2MML-BatchML/issues/44

Background

1. B2MML 7.0 still has the TestResult element in each instance resource property type per the old version of ISA-95 resource models and B2MML 6.0. The old resource model had an association relationship from each resource property to the Test Result object which did not allow Test Result object to be exchanged and queried as a 1st class object and did not allow Test Result object to be related to resource actuals.

2. The updated 950002 as part of the collaboration with OAGi changed Test Results to a 1st order object as part of the Operations Test Model.

3. ADDED new OperationsTest.xsd schema #101 with TestSpecificationType and TestResultType which allows 1st order transactions for both types. I do not believe that the 1st order transactions for both types were added to the updated 950005.

4. B2MML 7.0 beta only has B2MML-TestSpecification.xsd schema and has complex types of "TestResultType" and TestPropertyMeasurementType in the Common Schema.

5. In the new Operations Test Model in updated 950002, Test Result object is a 1st order object that is able to be exchanged/queried and has relationship to resource actual which is represented as a root element.

6. The MESA Committee may reject changing their implementation. If so, ERDi should create per updated standard.

Supporting Documents

1. Clause 5.9.1 Operations test model

2. Each of following resource models in updated 95002 do not have a Test Result object in their resource property objects. In the Operations Test Model, each of following resource models do have a Testable Object object that are target role in an association relationship from the Test Result object. Clause 5.4.1 Personnel model Clause 5.5.1 Role-based equipment model Clause 5.6.1 Physical asset model Clause 5.7.1 Material model

3. The following resource actual objects have a Test Result attributes per the Operations Test model Clause 6.3.6 Personnel actual, Table 208 – Personnel actual relationship roles Clause 6.3.8 Equipment actual, Table 212 – Equipment actual relationship roles Clause 6.3.10 Physical asset actual, Table 216 – Physical asset actual relationship roles Clause 6.3.12 Material actual, Table 220 – Material actual relationship roles

Impacted Types and Solutions B2MML - Equipment.xsd, EquipmentPropertyType B2MML - Material.xsd, MaterialLotPropertyType B2MML - PhysicalAsset.xsd, PhysicalAssetPropertyType B2MML - Personnel.xsd, PersonPropertyType

DELETE: TestResult element

[racheliurui]

Impacted Types

B2MML - Equipment.xsd

• EquipmentPropertyType B2MML - Material.xsd
• MaterialLotPropertyType B2MML - PhysicalAsset.xsd
• "PhysicalAssetPropertyType" B2MML - Personnel.xsd
• "PersonPropertyType",

[gerardmoloneyetpartners]

@racheliurui this part needs to be omitted from the MESA submission.

The MESA Committee may reject changing their implementation. If so, ERDi should create per updated standard. Schema updated: element: TestResult Deleted from complexType name = "MaterialLotPropertyType", "EquipmentPropertyType", "PhysicalAssetPropertyType", "PersonPropertyType",

[gerardmoloneyetpartners]

@CharlieG021163 Lets update this topic with more specific information (e.g. ADD, DELETE, CHANGE instructions etc.)

MESA feedback: I have no idea what is being proposed here.

[Dennis-Brandl]

I agree, there is no relationship in the ISA 05 Part 2 Ed2 document to the properties.
Delete TestResult from complexType name = "MaterialLotPropertyType", "EquipmentPropertyType", "PhysicalAssetPropertyType", "PersonPropertyType",

[terryrankine]

unsure if there is more work....

[gerardmoloneyetpartners]

@Dennis-Brandl so this change is accepted by MESA then? Please make it obvious by stating accepted.

[Dennis-Brandl]

Change not accepted. Deleted TestResult from complexType name = "MaterialLotPropertyType", "EquipmentPropertyType", "PhysicalAssetPropertyType", "PersonPropertyType".