Add OperationsEventTypeType, OperationsEventLevelType, MOMFunctionType, and EnterpriseFunctionType to Common.xsd for defined value lists in "OperationsEventType" to align with updated 950002

[CharlieG021163]

To align with Updated 95002, Operations Event Model. B2MML does not address the defined value for 4 elements in the OperationsEvent.xsd:

• OperationsEventDefinitionType and
• OperationsEventType.

Solution OperationsEvent.xsd complexType name = "OperationsEventDefinitionType" and
complexType name = "OperationsEventType" .

CHANGE: element name = "OperationsEventType" type = "OperationsTypeType" TO: type = "OperationsEventTypeType" CHANGE: element name = "OperationsEventLevel" type = "NumericType" TO: type = "OperationsEventLevelType" CHANGE: element name = "MOMFunction" type = "IdentifierType" TO: type = "MOMFunctionType"
CHANGE: element name = "EnterpriseFunction" type = "IdentifierType" TO: type = "EnterpriseFunctionType"
minOccurs = "0" maxOccurs = "unbounded"/>

Common.xsd ADD: "OperationsEventTypeType" ADD: "OperationsEventLevelType" ADD: "MOMFunctionType" ADD: "EnterpriseFunctionType"

Supporting Document ISA-950002 JWG5 CDV01 version (2019 12) Clause 5.11.5 Operations event definition, Table 132 – Operations event definition attributes Clause 5.11.8 Operations event, Table 137 – Operations event attributes

Impacted types B2MML-OperatrionsEvent.xsd: OperationsEventDefinitionType B2MML-OperatrionsEvent.xsd: OperationsEventType New B2MML-Common.xsd: OperationsEventTypeType New B2MML-Common.xsd: OperationsEventLevelType New B2MML-Common.xsd: MOMFunctionType New B2MML-Common.xsd: EnterpriseFunctionType

[racheliurui]

@CharlieG021163 I noticed you have a defined value with the character of & "&" is the reserved character for XML, what you've suggested will make that XSD failed to be parsed. Refer to below URL, https://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#syntax

So can R&D being replaced by "Research and Development" ?

[racheliurui]

CHANGE: element name = "OperationsEventType" type = "OperationsTypeType" TO: type = "OperationsEventTypeType"

For this change, in "Table 132 – Operations event definition attributes" , the attribute name is " Operations type", with a description of "Describes the category of operation.", why here you recommend to change the type to "OperationsEventTypeType"?

[racheliurui]

CHANGE: element name = "OperationsEventLevel" type = "NumericType" TO: type = "OperationsEventLevelType"

For this change, the table saying "Defined values are Level 3 and Level 4." why you are defining the level from Level 2?

[racheliurui]

Other than above-raised issues, agree with the rest of the changes.

[CharlieG021163]

First, this issue also applies to OperationsEventDefinitionType in OperationsEvent.xsd. and the new types are added to Common.xsd. I have updated the original issue above to reflex this.

Responses to Rachel's comments above.

1. Agreed. Change R&D to "Research and Development" in Common.xsd: EnterpriseFunctionType. Change DONE.

2. Disagree. Please re-review. Yes. Table 132 has an Operations Type attribute BUT the table also has an Operations Event Type attribute which is not the same attribute or B2MML type as operations type.

3. CHANGE: element name = "OperationsEventLevel" type = "NumericType" TO: type = "OperationsEventLevelType" Yes, the table says "Defined values are Level 3 and Level 4." why you are defining the level from Level 2. But what was learned during the BHP and Biogen implementation is that there are Level 2 Operations Events from Level 2 that are feedback on workflow specification states and transitions during execution. I am submitting a 95 committee commit for table change.

[racheliurui]

Agree

[CharlieG021163]

This Change to 950002 for adding Level 2 as a defined value to "OperationsEventLevelType" for Operations Event and Operations Event Definition was approved by ISA-95 and JWG5 Committee at Oct 2019 Meeting. Submit Issue to MESA.

[CharlieG021163]

Need to update transactions with Notify Transactions.

[Dennis-Brandl]

I agree with the change.