Closed awsdert closed 4 years ago
If you need a reference I found this: http://ref.x86asm.net/coder64.html
Intel and AT&T refer to the assembler syntax, not the instruction set. So it has nothing to do with instruction set support.
Hello, At first old URL changed in GitHub long before. And for disassembler, I use udis86 library. I thought it support AMD64 instruction too, doesn't it? Okay, anyway. In future wanted to switch to CapStone engine. Which is supervisor to udis86 and supports : Arm, Arm64 (Armv8), BPF, Ethereum Virtual Machine, M68K, M680X, Mips, MOS65XX, PowerPC, RISCV, Sparc, SystemZ, TMS320C64X, Web Assembly, XCore & X86 which includes X86_64 too.
I think it's enough for your needs. :)
Sorry I'm rather late to respond, been playing games and whatnot, also forgot I started this thread (only found it cause I'm reducing my bookmarks by locating thread based ones and just switching for a single thread search linked to my relative profiles). Anyways thanks very much I'll try it out when I get a chance (in middle of a separate but related project where I analyse expressions built from integers, floating point numbers, character literals, strings and calculate the result) which will be part of a portable compiler I'm trying to make
I'm on linux mint x64, I compiled a simple binary to get an understanding of how to use cpu instructions so that I can write my own compiler with an MIT license but when looking at the result in wxHexEditor it only provides INTEL & AT&T as options.
Also when I clicked the report bug option in the help menu it brought me to https://sourceforge.net/p/wxhexeditor/bugs/