Open geira opened 1 month ago
Can we solve this by rather using the start time in temporal extent interval?
So for an instance of a collection like this:
"title": "Foo",
"temporal": {
"interval": [
[
"2022-07-12T12:00Z",
"2022-07-14T18:00Z"
]
],
"values": [
"R54/2022-07-12T12:00Z/PT1H"
],
"trs": "TIMECRS[\"DateTime\",TDATUM[\"Gregorian Calendar\"],CS[temporal,1],AXIS[\"Time (T)\",future],TIMEUNIT[\"day\",86400]]"
},
you would present in a menu of instances as:
Foo (start time: 2024-10-09T12:00Z)
Bar (start time: 2024-10-09T18:00Z)
If so maybe we do not need any specific rules on instanceid.
No, because:
Also, apart from specific models there is no guarantee that the instanceId actually reflects model run time (could be ensemble members, e.g.).
I know, I formulated that badly. My point was, is the model run time actually important anymore? The models will run more and more frequently, so the start time or end time of the model might anyway be more informative. At least good enough for us not to have to solve this problem....
Just mentioning before I forget it...
GeoWEB reported an issue where they for any given data source need to present different model runs in a dropdown box with timestamps. Currently EDR only allows three text fields that are relevant: Id, Title and Description, which are not standardized between different data publishers. E.g.:
interpol.met.no
FMI
custom
field with extra temporal metadata (probably non-standard)MET Office
(Probably not relevant for GeoWEB, but shows how usage differs)