Closed ntsbs closed 7 months ago
I suggest we should reference the current draft 13 of OID4VCI in this RFC, because it includes a credential format profile for IETF SD-JWT VC. Given that SD-JWT VC was selected as credential format this should be used to derive the examples.
{ "credential_configurations_supported": { "SD_JWT_VC_example_in_OpenID4VCI": { "format": "vc+sd-jwt", "scope": "SD_JWT_VC_example_in_OpenID4VCI", "cryptographic_binding_methods_supported": [ "jwk" ], "credential_signing_alg_values_supported": [ "ES256" ], "display": [ { "name": "IdentityCredential", "locale": "en-US", "background_color": "#12107c", "text_color": "#FFFFFF" } ], "vct": "SD_JWT_VC_example_in_OpenID4VCI", "claims": { "given_name": { "display": [ { "name": "Given Name", "locale": "en-US" }, { "name": "Vorname", "locale": "de-DE" } ] }, "family_name": { "display": [ { "name": "Surname", "locale": "en-US" }, { "name": "Nachname", "locale": "de-DE" } ] }, "email": {}, "phone_number": {}, "address": { "street_address": {}, "locality": {}, "region": {}, "country": {} }, "birthdate": {}, "is_over_18": {}, "is_over_21": {}, "is_over_65": {} } } } }
PR #29 is using examples from HAIP
I suggest we should reference the current draft 13 of OID4VCI in this RFC, because it includes a credential format profile for IETF SD-JWT VC. Given that SD-JWT VC was selected as credential format this should be used to derive the examples.