Supporting HAIP as a mandatory?

EWC-consortium / eudi-wallet-rfcs

EU Digital Identity Wallet RFCs in EWC to align towards the Large Scale Pilot (LSP) usecases. The project is co-funded by the European Union.

https://eudiwalletconsortium.org/

Apache License 2.0

26 stars 14 forks source link

Supporting HAIP as a mandatory? #77

Open endimion opened 1 month ago

endimion commented 1 month ago

This issue is meant to open a discussion with respect to the use of HAIP in EWC.

In RFC001 v2 we mention supportitng HAIP.

The ARF v1.4 includes HAIP but only as a reference , we should make a decision as to if HAIP is mandator or optional (with respect to EWC piloting).

This obviously affects various parts of the RFC001 such requirement for Pushed Authorisation Request and so on...

Let us try to get a consensus ....

ntsbs commented 1 month ago

The intention of HAIP was also to restrict the options and therefore increase the likeliness of interop. I am in favor of making it mandatory. Any issues to be aware of here?

andreasabr commented 1 month ago

Yes, I fully agree but we have to keep in mind that there is a misalignment between HAIP and OIDC4VCI draft version 13 which needs to be considered.

endimion commented 1 month ago

Hey all, @andreasabr would you be kind enough to point to these issues so we can discuss (to be honest I was not aware)