Closed yasnmert closed 1 year ago
Hello, thanks for reaching out!
We've had some internal discussions about toggling webhooks from our client libraries before. We will take this under consideration now that we have a user requesting the feature.
We'll let you know of any updates!
The reason why we want this feature is actually we are wondering how it will behave after activating the webhook. When the webhooks are deleted, the events remain in the pending status and when a new webhook is created again, these events are not triggered and we have added special development to it.
But since we can't test its deactive state, we don't know its behavior. We estimate that events coming to a hook that is deactive will remain in the pending status. But when we reactivate the webhook, we don't know if the events that came while it was disabled will be triggered again. Could you give information about how the Behavior of the Events will be in this case?
Hey @yasnmert, this is a great feature request. At the present, we are unable to add this to the client library here because it's not yet supported at the API level (our support team can enable/disable webhooks for you). We think it's a worthwhile thing to pursue and would love if you could submit a formal API feature request to our support team at support@easypost.com. They can help get this in front of the right people.
Events will only occur if a valid webhook is enabled meaning that if events are triggered during the time there are no webhooks, then events will not get delivered; however, event statuses will continue to update if there is actual movement on the Event in question. Once a webhook has been registered or re-enabled (support can disable/enable webhooks for you), then events will attempt to deliver to that webhook for any future status changes.
All this to say, if you'd like to test this behavior our support team is able to disable/enable on your behalf and could assist with this. A disabled webhook should not get events during the time it's disabled. Once re-enabled, future event statuses should attempt to deliver to that webhook.
I'm going to close this issue for now since it's not related to the client library. If we do build out the ability to enable/disable webhooks via our API, we'd love for you to reopen this in the future and we can get this added to our client libs so it's easy for you to use.
I truly appreciate your assistance. Thanks.
Feature Request Is New
Description of the feature
Wehbooks have the feature to disable it automatically, but we do not have a chance to manually disable it. Could you add the feature to disable webhooks?