Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
i couldn't reproduce the exact bug you're reporting but there's definitely
something wrong with scheme creation/deletion right now.
we'll investigate it further
Original comment by vittorio...@gmail.com
on 23 Feb 2011 at 3:25
Original comment by vittorio...@gmail.com
on 23 Feb 2011 at 3:25
Original comment by vittorio...@gmail.com
on 5 Apr 2011 at 9:41
Original comment by vittorio...@gmail.com
on 18 Apr 2011 at 9:46
Original comment by vittorio...@gmail.com
on 22 Aug 2011 at 2:25
Has no relation to issue #146, can't reproduce.
Original comment by unC0Rr
on 2 Sep 2011 at 8:41
Original comment by vittorio...@gmail.com
on 3 Sep 2011 at 9:18
yeah i can't reproduce it either on linux, anyone willing to test this on
windows or mac which have a case insensitive file system?
Original comment by vittorio...@gmail.com
on 3 Sep 2011 at 9:21
[deleted comment]
Actually it's not a problem with schemes.ini since that uses uniquely numbered
names for each scheme/INI label.
There is a problem with writing weapons.ini since it uses the weapon config
name for each config and at least on Windows, INI sections are case insensitive.
http://doc.qt.nokia.com/stable/qsettings.html#section-and-key-syntax
Original comment by gtamulti
on 3 Sep 2011 at 6:09
I spent some time on this, here are some updates
* for weapons:
1. you cannot delete default sets
2. you cannot overwrite default sets
3. if the new set has different casing from the default one, both can exist
4. if the new set has different casing from a custom one, the former will be
ignored
(not critical, but the 4th point could be fixed)
* for schemes:
1. you cannot delete default schemes
2. you can give a name of a default scheme and both will be listed
3. if the new scheme has different casing from the default one, both can exist
4. if the new set has different casing from a custom one, both can exist
(point number 3 can actually cause issues and should be fixed before release)
Original comment by vittorio...@gmail.com
on 23 Oct 2012 at 5:52
Does this still happen with the new physfs backend?
Original comment by vittorio...@gmail.com
on 27 Aug 2013 at 7:38
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
gtamulti
on 28 Dec 2010 at 2:37