Open Sineos opened 1 year ago
Thank you for the recommendations! We'll take a look at incorporating these into an upcoming revision to the spec.
One additional comment to https://github.com/EcmaTC53/spec/blob/master/docs/proposals/Sensor%20Classes%202022.md
Most of the commonly available (read affordable) gas sensors are not able to differentiate between different Alkanes, e.g. LPG, I-butane, Propane, Methane, alcohol etc. Maybe a "combustible gas" class or similar would fit well
Interesting. If you could provide part numbers and/or links to some gas sensors that fit into your common/available/affordable group, that would be helpful.
Some example are the MQ-x sensors for which many different variation exists with different sensitivities to various gases.
https://components101.com/sites/default/files/component_datasheet/MQ2%20Gas%20sensor.pdf
https://www.electronicoscaldas.com/datasheet/MQ-135_Hanwei.pdf
Or some other sensor manufacturers:
https://www.winsen-sensor.com/d/files/wsp2110-(ver1_5)---manual(1).pdf
https://www.sgxsensortech.com/content/uploads/2015/02/1143_Datasheet-MiCS-6814-rev-8.pdf
As you can see, some gases could be identified by very careful calibration to certain resistance ranges (something probably quite impossible without very specialized equipment). Other will not work at all, since their sensitive curves intersect or are very close nearby.
Edit: While it makes sense to have dedicated classes for individual gases, e.g. H2 or O2 can be identified pretty clearly with the right sensors (e.g. ME2-O2-Ф20 Oxygen Sensor), I dare say that many (most?) are not selective enough to identify individual gases. IMO calling such a sensor a Methane gas sensor, is not really correct.
The spec should also contain: