teixeirak
commented
3 years ago @ValentineHerr , FYI, these are the only two concerns that have been raised about our results. I'm not sure what's going on with either. For NM, it may be that the additive effects modify the effects observed for single variables. For HKK, I'm really not sure what's going on. I want to dig into both a bit more, but for now I wouldn't change anything in the analysis methods.
Here, I'm recording comments that may affect our analysis:
Ellis (NM): " I still find it curious that there is no significant variable in the temp group for LT PIPO, yet it shows up in the PIST2. This is counter to the SEASCORR (traditional method) analysis with PRISM Tmean that returns sig results for multiple months for PIPO, and a much weaker relationship for PIST2 with Temp. "
Patrick (HKK): "For the HKK data previous Sept to current June precipitation is a pretty weird predictor as it includes both the two wettest months of the rainy season, as well as entire dry season and the transition back into the monsoon. And the U-shaped responses (to precip) also seem odd to me."