Closed teixeirak closed 2 years ago
@NidhiVinod , what do you think about this?
@teixeirak, there are very few papers on this section, but I asked Elsa if she might know a few more papers for here since remote sensing people are really excited about this topic. But, I'll try to find a few more! It would make sense to make it it's own section paralleling the table, but actually maybe it is okay to have it after metabolic capacity and efficiency since leaf light absorption and reflectance would depend on a combination of leaf anatomy and biochemical traits. What do you think would make it more intuitive?
Sounds good. I'm not sure which way is more intuitive.
I'm gathering papers and thinking this section now. @teixeirak, may I can change the heading to leaf optical properties instead or leaf absorption, reflectance and transmittance?
Sounds good.
@NidhiVinod , should we have a text section on this? It's currently integrated in with
Leaf anatomy and morphology
andMetabolic capacity and efficiency
, but to parallel the table maybe it should have it's own section? Also, I think it would make more sense to put it ahead ofMetabolic capacity and efficiency
in both the table and the text (especially if we include a text section).
Actually, I think you're right. It might be better above metabolic capacity and effiency
section. I'll move it there
I moved it.
@teixeirak, I think we can close this right?
Yes.
@NidhiVinod , should we have a text section on this? It's currently integrated in with
Leaf anatomy and morphology
andMetabolic capacity and efficiency
, but to parallel the table maybe it should have it's own section? Also, I think it would make more sense to put it ahead ofMetabolic capacity and efficiency
in both the table and the text (especially if we include a text section).