EcoClimLab / vertical-thermal-review

Manuscript and new analysis files for Vinod et al., 2022, New Phytologist
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
0 stars 0 forks source link

Refrences #125

Closed NidhiVinod closed 2 years ago

NidhiVinod commented 2 years ago

References: • Ensure article titles are given in the References section in journal style (e.g. Latin/gene names appropriately italicised; subscript/superscript characters). • Atherton et al. (2017), Bertrand et al. (2020), Christoffersen et al. (2016), Doughty & Goulden (2008), Feeley et al. (2020), Krinner et al. (2005), Muir (2019), Scheffers et al. (2013): add the page ranges for these journal articles. • Bennett et al. (2021), Garcia (2021), Monson et al. (2021), Niinemets et al. (2015b): insert volume number and page range for these references. • Carter & Cavaleri (2018), Chen et al. (2020): insert the article ID/page range for these references. • Bin et al. (2022), Heilman et al (2022): insert the doi for these journal articles (or if the information is available, the volume number and page range). • Burgess et al. (2006): please insert further information to aid the reader in accessing this citation (e.g. URL and date accessed, or publisher and place of publication). • Haberlandt (1914), McDowell et al. (2011): insert the place of publication (city, state (if US) and country) for these citations. • Harris & Medina (2013): insert the volume number. • IPCC (2021), Pörtner et al. (2021): please insert further information to aid the reader in accessing these citations (e.g. publisher, URL and date accessed, or publisher and place of publication). • Kesselmeier & Staudt: please add the year of publication as well as the page range. • Kunert (in press): please update the reference with the year and the article identifier or, if the information is available, the volume number and page range. • Lowman & Rinker (1995): insert the editors and the place of publication (city, state (if US) and country) for this book chapter citation. • Piponiot et al. (2022): this paper has now been published in an issue of New Phytologist. Please update this citation with the following volume number and page range: 234: 5. • Slot et al. (2021b): if the information is available, update the article identifier with the volume number and page range.

NidhiVinod commented 2 years ago

@teixeirak, some of the references need range of page numbers, do you know how to do that? Would you do it in Zotero or manually?

teixeirak commented 2 years ago

Fix it in Zotero so that it's permanently fixed in your library.

NidhiVinod commented 2 years ago

@teixeirak, Kunert (in press) is published right?

NidhiVinod commented 2 years ago

@teixeirak, for this citation below, since it is so old, I am unable to locate the editors and place of citation, what do we do? Lowman & Rinker (1995): insert the editors and the place of publication (city, state (if US) and country) for this book chapter citation.

teixeirak commented 2 years ago

@teixeirak, for this citation below, since it is so old, I am unable to locate the editors and place of citation, what do we do? Lowman & Rinker (1995): insert the editors and the place of publication (city, state (if US) and country) for this book chapter citation.

If you google it, you may be able to find the full citation in another study.

teixeirak commented 2 years ago

@teixeirak, Kunert (in press) is published right?

Yes, here's the DOI: 10.1111/plb.13349

NidhiVinod commented 2 years ago

@teixeirak, do you think it would be better to take the tables out of the manuscript and upload tables as word documents while submitting? What do you think? Or should I move everything to excell? • I notice that the tables are pasted into the main text file as graphics and, unfortunately it is not possible to typeset the tables from this format. Insert the two tables in editable form in the main text file or upload separate Excel files.

NidhiVinod commented 2 years ago

@teixeirak, almost done with all the edits but wondering if I should email Agriculture and Forest Meterology, I cannot find about re-using published figures?

image

teixeirak commented 2 years ago

@teixeirak, do you think it would be better to take the tables out of the manuscript and upload tables as word documents while submitting? What do you think? Or should I move everything to excell?

• I notice that the tables are pasted into the main text file as graphics and, unfortunately it is not possible to typeset the tables from this format. Insert the two tables in editable form in the main text file or upload separate Excel files.

It seems for the editors comment that we just need to paste in the word versions (once we've done the final knit).

teixeirak commented 2 years ago

@teixeirak, almost done with all the edits but wondering if I should email Agriculture and Forest Meterology, I cannot find about re-using published figures?

image

Oh, I was meaning to do that one. Typically if you navigate to the pub there's a "request permission " option. I've done this quite a few times and can get it soon if you can't figure it out.

NidhiVinod commented 2 years ago

@teixeirak, almost done with all the edits but wondering if I should email Agriculture and Forest Meterology, I cannot find about re-using published figures? image

Oh, I was meaning to do that one. Typically if you navigate to the pub there's a "request permission " option. I've done this quite a few times and can get it soon if you can't figure it out.

@teixeirak, thank you, sounds good! Yes, I can't find the request permission option, maybe you can do it?

NidhiVinod commented 2 years ago

@teixeirak, are the thickness of the arrows to differentiate between 0% and the rest? image

teixeirak commented 2 years ago

@teixeirak, thank you, sounds good! Yes, I can't find the request permission option, maybe you can do it?

For future reference, it's in the bottom right of this image (different for different journals):

image
NidhiVinod commented 2 years ago

oh I see, thanks Krista!

teixeirak commented 2 years ago

@teixeirak, are the thickness of the arrows to differentiate between 0% and the rest? image

For reference, here's the original: image

His caption doesn't say anything about the meaning of the thicknesses. Thickness is clearly not directly, quantitatively proportional to the size of the flux, and I'm noticing that the thickness of evaporation from interception is more than transpiration from emerged trees although transpiration is bigger. So I probably would just respond that the arrow thickness is not significant and leave our caption as is. If you'd like I could check with Nobby, but I doubt that will change the answer.

NidhiVinod commented 2 years ago

@teixeirak, this is the last thing that is remaining: image I added Lawren's.

NidhiVinod commented 2 years ago

oh and this one: image

teixeirak commented 2 years ago

@teixeirak, this is the last thing that is remaining: image I added Lawren's.

Looks like this is complete except for yours, right? It probably makes sense to create one now.

teixeirak commented 2 years ago

I believe everything else here is done' closing this.