Fix issue 98

[SarahAlidoost]

Description

closes #98. I tested this branch with small datasets of three different sites. This branch produces the same results as those from the main branch.

Checklist

• [x] Add a reference to related issues.
• [x] @mentions of the person or team responsible for reviewing proposed changes.
• [x] This pull request has a descriptive title.
• [x] Code is written according to the guidelines.
• [x] The checks by MISS_HIT style checker and linter, below the pull request, are successful (green).
• [x] Documentation is available.
• [x] Add changes to the changelog file under section Unreleased.
• [x] Model runs successfully.
• [x] Ask a meinatainer to re-generate exe file if matlab codes are changed. About how to create an exe file, see exe readme.

[SarahAlidoost]

Great work, Sarah! I just have some very minor comments.

I tested the code for two sites, two weeks each, and there was no difference at all. I only tested the code with Matlab, I assume you developed this using octave and that needs no test?

Thanks for the review and comment. Yes, I tested the results with octave. Good that you tested with Matlab too. Regarding the syntax compatibility between Matlab and Octave, if there is any problem with Matlab syntax, creating exe file returns an error.