Closed jrutyna closed 10 months ago
@jrutyna, I think this is fixed. I ran plan 241 again and got 0.04% error (see the comparison between the updated results on the left and the old results from your 30_Mass_Balance_JMR.ipynb notebook below):
Does this look good to you? I can merge into main if yes.
@sjordan29: Yes, this looks like a significant improvement in the accounting for the mass flux across the faces at the boundary cells. Yes, please merge these commits to main.
@jrutyna noticed that there was a mass balance issue in plan 241. Upon investigating it was determined that the mass flux variables for the downstream boundary was only using the boundary condition of 25 mg/L for this calculation and not using the concentration values in the cells next to the boundary. @sjordan29 should investigate further to determine how to fix this issue.