Closed EdOverflow closed 6 years ago
We believe that our latest version of the formula resolves this problem by forcing n
to be within the 1.0 to 3.0 range.
We also suggested that users decrease n
as b_{max}
increases.
We recommend setting a lower value for
n
as you increaseb_{max}
. This should ensure that the gap between values in the 7.0 to 10.0 CVSS score range is not too big.
Description
richinseattle notified me of an interesting issue in our formula when supplying it with values greater than 2 for
n
.Steps To Reproduce
Set
n
to a value greater than 2. I am usingn = 6
below.Result
There is a very large gap between the bounty amount for a CVSS score of 9.0 versus a score of 10.0 — namely $5314 for 9.0 and $10'000 for 10.0.
Potential Solutions
The following are some potential solutions that may even be combined to resolve this problem and other problem for
n
in the future.1) Create an S-curve as richinseattle pointed out. [1] 2) Form pairs of CVSS scores. [2] 3) Base the bounty on the maximum value in the CVSS rating rather than basing it off the CVSS score. This is similar to approach 2). 4) Base
n
on a large data set. This would allow us to create "realistic" values forn
for the three categories mentioned in the write-up. [3]