Closed Ashutosh00710 closed 3 years ago
If you would like to continue contributing to open source and would like to do it with an awesome inclusive community, you should join our Discord chat and our GitHub Organisation - we help and encourage each other to contribute to open source little and often 🤓 . Any questions let us know.
Hi @Ashutosh00710,
This looks really cool. I'll definitely play with it a bit more. The readme could do with a little update, though. The section about passing my username the url was immediately clear to me. I can see where I need to change, but do I need that entire line to try it out? I don't know just by looking at what's written in the readme.
[![Ashutosh's github activity graph](https://activity-graph.herokuapp.com/graph?username=Ashutosh00710)](https://github.com/ashutosh00710/github-readme-activity-graph)
I am guessing, for example, that I do not need this section.
[![Ashutosh's github activity graph]
Looking closer, it appears the only section I need is:
https://activity-graph.herokuapp.com/graph?username=Ashutosh00710
I would change the readme to reflect that.
Finally, looking at the graph itself. You don't have to, but you could add a footer at the bottom of the graph that points back to your github repo. This means, for example, If I use the link to display the graph somewhere outside GitHub (e.g. my website) others can click on the footer and it will take them to your repo.
That's my 2p. I hope it helps.
ps. I can make the README file changes and raise a PR if you like. pps. I love the Dracula theme :)
Hello! @mikeysan .Thank you so much for reviewing the project 🙂, it means a lot. Feel free to contribute to this project. You can raise an issue and then make your pull request.
About the footer idea I think it's a great idea. You can raise issue for this also to get another green square for the day 🟩.
We will definitely implement this feature ASAP.
I'll be honoured to help. Thanks.
I have raised an issue for the footer link.
I will raise another issue and work on the Readme shortly (after making dinner) :)
Your github-profile looks great :+1:
I plan on checking out the project later... It looks interesting 🙃
Thank you @Vyvy-vi for your appreciation, feedback and attention. 🙂
This community is really very active, responsive and supporting. I am glad to be a part of this community. Thank you @eddiejaoude for all this 🙂
Thank you for sharing 👍 . I will review in a live stream or video soon 🤓
Some Feedback/Suggestions:
CONTRIBUTING.md
file also states how to stash changes and also gives detailed folder-structure :+1:development
branch there... It seems to be merged into the main, but right now is 33 commits behind main
.
Is that branch a stale branch from the previous PR, or is it the one that is used as the defacto development branch?CONTRIBUTING.md
file that gives instructions on how to sync your fork. This is a great open source practice, but I think it needs a slight update. The current line states git pull upstream master
, but I think there is no master
branch on the repo.CONTRIBUTING.md
file doesn't state npm install
before npm start
(this might throw off new contributers, that haven't used npm before)easy
label. Now, that is completely fine, but personally using easy
as a comparison on issues and PRs might be slightly demeaning/demotivating, and maybe what's easy for you might not be easy for someone else.. Perhaps look into slightly different language like beginner friendly
or first timers
Hey, @Vyvy-vi I am highly impressed by your efforts in having a closer look at the project. Thanks for your Feedback/Suggestions.
I see a
development
branch there... It seems to be merged into the main, but right now is 33 commits behindmain
.
It was 33 commits behind because I was experimenting with some major changes in the code which may break the tool.
There's a line in
CONTRIBUTING.md
file that gives instructions on how to sync your fork. This is a great open source practice, but I think it needs a slight update. The current line statesgit pull upstream master
, but I think there is nomaster
branch of the repo.
Yes, great point, thanks for driving my attention towards that.
The
CONTRIBUTING.md
file doesn't state npm install before npm start (this might throw off new contributers, that haven't used npm before)
Another, good point.
I see an
easy
label. Now, that is completely fine, but personally usingeasy
as a comparison on issues and PRs might be slightly demeaning/demotivating, and maybe what's easy for you might not be easy for someone else.. Perhaps look into slightly different language likebeginner friendly
orfirst timers
.
Yes, I totally agree, I'll rename the tag soon.
Excellent feedback @Vyvy-vi
@Ashutosh00710 I just commented on a closed issue on your repo. I'm glad to see someone else got the green square for the footer :)
Great project, reviewed on a live stream, some of the EddieHub feedback..
__test__
folder, is this naming special, looks like python standard?Thank You @eddiejaoude and EddieHub for reviewing my project on the live stream.
I've learned all the valuable Open Source things from you and your YouTube Page.
Great contributing.md file 👍
Loved this ❤
Why have a
__test__
folder, is this naming special, looks like python standard?
It contains tests related to project.
Suggest taking a tag/release
Sure I do.
Special thanks to @eddiejaoude @nhcarrigan @Vyvy-vi @mikeysan
For their valuable suggestion, feedback and support. They are proof of Collaboration First, Code Second. ❤
Grateful to each one of you.
It contains tests related to project.
Right but why is it named with underscores like that? Instead of just test
or tests
?
Right but why is it named with underscores like that? Instead of just test or tests?
I was new to writing tests and watched __test__
naming in a video that's why I didn't know the standards. I'll rename it surely.
Btw, we don't use __test__
for the test folder in python :person_shrugging: afaik
Items we can review on a live stream:
This project is related to GitHub readme(s). A dynamically generated activity graph to show your GitHub activities of last 31 days.
Work in progress and open for contribution for feature enhancement.