Closed jcowey closed 1 year ago
I can do this @jcowey, but I want to confirm the appropriate hybrid <idno>
first; neither Pap.Lugd.Bat.
nor p.l.bat.
is currently in the RDF (though the latter is used by DCLP). I suspect you'd opt for pap.lugd.bat;23;7
but want to confirm.
Sorry, do not have a quick answer here. I am not keen on opening up pap.lugd.bat. Would like to check the Demotic Berichtigungsliste to see what Vleeming called the volume. Will let you know in due course.
We discussed using ddbdp;2023;1
as the hybrid-idno yesterday, while encoding Pap.Lugd.Bat. under <bibl type=“publication” subtype=“principal”>
.
Created and submitted to boards
https://www.trismegistos.org/tm/detail.php?tm=817897
So far not in the system, apart from:
https://papyri.info/apis/leidenpapinst.apis.o057