Closed jcowey closed 6 months ago
DCLP has been wrangled. It remains to update rdf with mper.ns
; I believe we agreed that mper.xiii
should persist and not be nested within a larger mper
series.
107414 has <idno type="ddb-hybrid">mper.xiii;;6</idno>
and <idno type="ddb-filename">mper.xiii.6</idno>
. These idnos are wrong: they should be mper.ns;13;6
. There is no corresponding DDB file.
All other instances of MPER are in DCLP, and I’ve already wrangled them in #382.
So, I see the following two steps as necessary:
mper.ns;13;6
mper.xiii
from the RDF, since there are no other files that require it, and since we have both mper
and mper.ns
in RDF.https://github.com/papyri/idp.data/blob/master/HGV_meta_EpiDoc/HGV108/107414.xml
should now be clean with https://github.com/papyri/idp.data/commit/162eaac2ef8caa4d03b7d8ce07c1e027a5ffef8b
https://github.com/papyri/idp.data/blob/master/RDF/collection.rdf
should now be clean with https://github.com/papyri/idp.data/commit/3bc4d627e5be8a70158f90901537eb57d29bda2b
We have MPER I-VI and MPER N.S. I-XXXIII and ongoing.
At https://github.com/papyri/idp.data/blob/master/RDF/collection.rdf#L1236-L1238 we have:
How often is this used? Search for
<idno type="ddb-hybrid">mper
across HGV_meta_XML and DCLP.The RDF only seems to apply to one file in HGV_meta_XML (there is an accompanying ddbdp file waiting to be voted through on the DDbDP board): https://github.com/papyri/idp.data/blob/master/HGV_meta_EpiDoc/HGV108/107414.xml#L10-L14
Across DCLP files we have 228 instances in 228 files of
<idno type="dclp-hybrid">mpern.s;3;16</idno>
likedclp-hybrid
and one instance in one file of<idno type="dclp-hybrid">mper;29;59</idno>
(alongside what is "should" be:<idno type="dclp-hybrid">mpern.s;29;27</idno>
)In DCLP files we should have
<idno type="dclp-hybrid">mper.ns;3;16</idno>
mpern.s;
=>mper.ns;
<idno type="dclp-hybrid">mper;29;59</idno>
=><idno type="dclp-hybrid">mper.ns;29;59</idno>