Closed mulhod closed 3 years ago
Hello @mulhod! Thanks for updating this PR.
tests/test_output.py
:Line 398:47: E741 ambiguous variable name 'l'
Merging #645 (45d13af) into main (48dc473) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
90.38%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #645 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.11% 95.11%
=======================================
Files 27 27
Lines 3093 3093
=======================================
Hits 2942 2942
Misses 151 151
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
skll/learner/utils.py | 94.94% <57.14%> (ø) |
|
skll/experiments/__init__.py | 95.19% <80.00%> (ø) |
|
skll/learner/__init__.py | 96.26% <93.33%> (ø) |
|
skll/config/__init__.py | 95.09% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
skll/config/utils.py | 95.65% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
skll/data/writers.py | 94.11% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
skll/experiments/output.py | 97.36% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
skll/metrics.py | 97.87% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
...utils/commandline/compute_eval_from_predictions.py | 97.18% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
skll/utils/commandline/filter_features.py | 98.41% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
... and 9 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 48dc473...45d13af. Read the comment docs.
Why the coverage check is failing I have no idea. When I click on the "Details" link, I don't see any change in coverage... Perhaps I'm not reading it correctly?
@bndgyawali If you get a chance, could you take a look at this? There are quite a few changes, but they are all cosmetic.
Closes #636
Mainly, this PR has to do with cleaning up some multi-line string concatenations (or removing them altogether when possible). There are a couple other randomish improvements I made as well (like reducing the length of some very long lines or lines where it was easy to do, removing unused parameters from a function used by a test, etc.).