ThePokerDude
commented
5 days ago B4 0E8E82B5993CCADFD884F9DC53A7 South's hand is a typical semi forcing. If we do not have a semiforcing opening we should open with 1s. North should respond with 3nt to 3s
B11 0577FF3A88476C5F45D7E435FC6E
With a known 10-card fit East should show trump Q, then at least 6S can be bid Definitely - this needs to be hard coded. Not sure how you implemented the trum queen ask. The most simple one - you check for quuen trump in the hand of the responder to the question.
A more advanced one would be to keep track of known trumps to each of the bidders. East knows of 10 and west knows of 9 So for the queen trump ask the more advanced code would look like: if KnownTrumps >=10 then true else if Trump queen there then true else false end if
B14 0CDE169755DC253E3A36B2284CAB
general rule as opener if you have fit choose a bid which shows fit immediately only as responder it is allowed to go for a delayed fit showing
B15 0120039B805DCE36776472803608
Table 1: 3s instead of 6s related to B14 "only as responder it is allowed to go for a delayed fit showing" 1s p 2d p 2h p - now you bid 3s (if 2s could bo dubleton). As you are forced to game you show 3+ support in spades and extra values.
Table 2: the jump to 4h is wrong as north should not exclude the possibility of 3nt after 1s p 2d p It is better to bid 2h instead of 4h - a hand with no extras in HCP
B21 105E761F904388AD460F26A1BCED
west's first bid is wrong - if fit not guaranteed (only 4c) and 5+ cards in onother suit -> bid other suit so insted of 2c west shoud bid 1d or 2d if 2d shows a strong hand
Afterwards 1c p 2c p - here 3nt 18-19 balanced
B22 1C1565D7CE28ED2F4BE92043A3E9
Table 2 1s p 2c 4h 4nt p 5c p
West passes (probably) because west considers the option of 0 key cards I propose that you implement a HCP plausiblity check. 2c game force means 12+HCP Together we have 14+12 (or more) = 26+ HCP -> maximum of 14 HCP missing HCP of missing key cards = 15 (3 aces + Kc) -> partner cannot have 0 key cards
B23 1E57D8F29CC1EA5EFC7586228018
As 4h is a calcualted bid the calculation after splinter bids seems wrong To decide if to continue (cue bid or kcb) or to sign off you should check a weighted point count the weight factors should be 1 for cards outside splinter suit, 0.8 for ace in splinter suit, 0.3 for king in splinter suit, 0 for Q and J in splinter suit. In this situation:
14/15 weighed points -> continue <14 -> sign off Off course this model could be refined but I think it could be a good starting point for splinter evaluation
B24 1D75637DAE2E0E0960BFBCF01502 Table 1 When partner shows 0, so we miss 2 we need to pass to 5d The calculation behind the 6d bid is wrong. If we have asked for aces, we have to include the information for our decision/calculation. For a slam the "missing aces" count has to be 1 or less.
B26 1625F55DC7B09C490B04EF2610AE Table 1
Here I see two different problems. Let's say asking for aces is ok - 1st - we should implement 4d as kcb instead of 4nt 2nd - if blackwood is only possible with 4nt then if trumps are clubs or diamonds we need 5nt as sign off
here after 5s we had to bid a hopeless slam with 2 aces missing. If 5nt would be sign off, we would have good chances making it.
EdwardPiwowar
0E8E82B5993CCADFD884F9DC53A7
7C looks wrong
The penalty double is just bad
0577FF3A88476C5F45D7E435FC6E
With a known 10-card fit East should show trump Q, then at least 6S can be bid
0CDE169755DC253E3A36B2284CAB
Table 2: Rebidding 3D with 4-card support is wrong
0120039B805DCE36776472803608
6S??
105E761F904388AD460F26A1BCED
East should show the 18-19 bal
1C1565D7CE28ED2F4BE92043A3E9
Asking for aces, but then pass only missing an ace so 7 could still be on
1E57D8F29CC1EA5EFC7586228018
The splinter is perfect for East at table 2, so missing the slam is bad
1D75637DAE2E0E0960BFBCF01502
Really not worth a slam try on the east hand, so pass to 3N
1625F55DC7B09C490B04EF2610AE
4N is just to optimistic
This was the first 26 boards of 433 I recorded long time ago for Soloway Jump shift