4!H? I'd rather bid 7!H

[ADavidBailey]

[ADavidBailey]

How 'bout 4N. Once you learn about 2 aces and the K!D, 6!H is a lock.

[ThorvaldAagaard]

I think 4H is wrong, and North should just bid 2H But when posting a board, then please copy the identifier for the board

Copy the hand with is correct number

Then we can paste that into BBA and try different biddings.

Here is is the number: 0889C1D0448DCA5A6041D40242F7

Now 4N is RKC but for diamonds, that is strange

Looking at the 2 hands you want to be in 7D, that is the best contract.

[ADavidBailey]

This 'Forcing Pass' scenario produces lots of interesting hands -- many slams with less than 30 combined HCP. I've tweaked it so that 2nd seat has a little better suit -- 2 of the top3 rather than 2 of the top4. I'll update the pbns and lins in a few minutes.

[ADavidBailey]

Here's another similar hand. Hopefully, I'll post it with the number: 0FD31B2894DF12A2B89B245A9A05

[ADavidBailey]

Hmmm, it'didn't post a screen-shot of the hand. What did I do wrong?

[ThorvaldAagaard]

Same hand just rotated 90 degrees

But fine with the number

[ThorvaldAagaard]

You need to copy paste the number, and then the scrreen

[ADavidBailey]

It's wierd that I got the exact same deal -- moved from 11 to 4 -- after I rebuilt the lin-rotated-... file. It never occurred to me that it might be the same board.

[EdwardPiwowar]

Very interesting hand, David. It may be like below, but these are very unbalanced hands and it is difficult to locate key cards.

[ThePokerDude]

I think it's ok now

[ADavidBailey]

This is interesting...

This morning I woke up thinkin' 'bout vulnerability and I see you closed this post, that's 'bout vulnerbility. My nightmare deserves a post of it's own. Stay tuned...

[EdwardPiwowar]

Then close it yourself if you think it's ok.

[ADavidBailey]

Thank you!