search

EdwardPiwowar / BBA

1 stars 0 forks source link

raise of weak twos is inconsistent in competitive bidding #759

Open ThePokerDude opened 3 months ago

ThePokerDude commented 3 months ago

2FC0D63E661CE1B4CA53FFA7C651 This board is originally from https://github.com/EdwardPiwowar/BBA/issues/239 East bids 3s after 2s X but passes after 2s 3c and 2s 3d. I do not understand the reasoning behind it. I think 3s is correct in all 3 cases. image image image

EdwardPiwowar commented 2 weeks ago

3s after 2s X but passes after 2s 3c and 2s 3d is intentional. After 3m opponents have more information and blocking no longer provides any tangible benefits. The test shows no significant differences. But it should be an option in CC.

ThorvaldAagaard commented 2 weeks ago

Following the Law is a goodf idea most of the time. Here it will prevent South to bid 3S asking for a stopper