Closed pacu closed 2 years ago
I also note that the README
says that the license is MIT, but the repository has both LICENSE-APACHE
and LICENSE-MIT
. If the intent is to dual-license MIT OR Apache-2.0
then I suggest adopting the wording from typical Rust projects, including the Contribution
sub-section. See e.g. https://github.com/zcash/librustzcash/blob/master/zcash_primitives/README.md
https://github.com/zcash-hackworks/MnemonicSwift#license should say:
## License
Copyright 2017-2021 CikeQiu.
Copyright 2020-2021 The Electric Coin Company.
Licensed under either of
* Apache License, Version 2.0, ([LICENSE-APACHE](LICENSE-APACHE) or
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)
* MIT license ([LICENSE-MIT](LICENSE-MIT) or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
at your option.
### Contribution
Unless you explicitly state otherwise, any contribution intentionally
submitted for inclusion in the work by you, as defined in the Apache-2.0
license, shall be dual licensed as above, without any additional terms or
conditions.
(The copyright for CikeQiu should not have been removed in 2657bdadf7bd6594293730a8ba25735865a8ce0f.)
Reference: @daira pointed out this conflict https://github.com/zcash-hackworks/MnemonicSwift/pull/10#issuecomment-995166413
we need specific review to know if this was addressed or if we need further adjustments