Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We'd like to follow up on this issue, where we defined the ideal situation - using BLOCKS_METADATA_BUFFER_SIZE the same size as the sync batch. We use SYNC_BATCH_SIZE and then SYNC_BATCH_SMALL_SIZE for the sandblasting period, so the BLOCKS_METADATA_BUFFER_SIZE should reflect this.
Currently, we only raised the BLOCKS_METADATA_BUFFER_SIZE to 1000, which brings great sync machine speed up (about 50%) and still works well for the sandblasting period.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We'd like to follow up on this issue, where we defined the ideal situation - using
BLOCKS_METADATA_BUFFER_SIZEthe same size as the sync batch. We useSYNC_BATCH_SIZEand thenSYNC_BATCH_SMALL_SIZEfor the sandblasting period, so theBLOCKS_METADATA_BUFFER_SIZEshould reflect this.Currently, we only raised the
BLOCKS_METADATA_BUFFER_SIZEto 1000, which brings great sync machine speed up (about 50%) and still works well for the sandblasting period.Describe the solution you'd like
Alternatives you've considered
Additional context