Open twdragon opened 2 years ago
WT901C-TTL, with WitMotion TTL-USB adapter cable
Baud: 9600, 57600, 115200 Polling rates: 10Hz, 100Hz
Device works fine with WitMotion.exe app under Windows. Can set different baud rates and polling frequencies without problem.
Can not get it to work under Ubuntu 22.04 with ROS2 Humble. Regardless of configuration (baud rate, polling frequency), it always reports the following.
cmp@mele1:~/trot_ws$ ros2 launch witmotion_ros wt901.launch.py
[INFO] [launch]: All log files can be found below /home/cmp/.ros/log/2023-05-11-08-57-47-628690-mele1-16756
[INFO] [launch]: Default logging verbosity is set to INFO
[INFO] [witmotion_ros_node-1]: process started with pid [16757]
[witmotion_ros_node-1] [INFO] [1683759467.797155161] [ROSWitmotionSensorController]: Controller started
[witmotion_ros_node-1] [INFO] [1683759467.797345009] [MinimalPublisher]: QT spin !!!!!
[witmotion_ros_node-1] [ERROR] [1683759468.199331411] [ROSWitmotionSensorController]: Sensor error: No data acquired during last 3 iterations, please check the baudrate!
[witmotion_ros_node-1] [INFO] [1683759468.199378377] [ROSWitmotionSensorController]: Entering SUSPENDED state
[witmotion_ros_node-1] QObject::killTimer: Timers cannot be stopped from another thread
[witmotion_ros_node-1] QObject::~QObject: Timers cannot be stopped from another thread
[witmotion_ros_node-1] QSocketNotifier: Socket notifiers cannot be enabled or disabled from another thread
[ERROR] [witmotion_ros_node-1]: process has died [pid 16757, exit code -11, cmd '/home/cmp/trot_ws/install/witmotion_ros/lib/witmotion_ros/witmotion_ros_node --ros-args --params-file /home/cmp/trot_ws/install/witmotion_ros/share/witmotion_ros/config/wt901.yml'].
Launch.log output is:
1683760901.5459187 [INFO] [launch]: All log files can be found below /home/cmp/.ros/log/2023-05-11-09-21-41-538783-mele1-20854
1683760901.5461226 [INFO] [launch]: Default logging verbosity is set to INFO
1683760901.6677451 [INFO] [witmotion_ros_node-1]: process started with pid [20855]
1683760901.7071021 [witmotion_ros_node-1] [INFO] [1683760901.706649358] [ROSWitmotionSensorController]: Controller started
1683760901.7075522 [witmotion_ros_node-1] [INFO] [1683760901.706821295] [MinimalPublisher]: QT spin !!!!!
1683760901.7079248 [witmotion_ros_node-1] Opening device "ttyUSB1" at 57600 baud
1683760901.7081082 [witmotion_ros_node-1] Instantiating timer at 50 ms
1683760901.9087548 [witmotion_ros_node-1] [ERROR] [1683760901.908408072] [ROSWitmotionSensorController]: Sensor error: No data acquired during last 3 iterations, please check the baudrate!
1683760901.9090066 [witmotion_ros_node-1] [INFO] [1683760901.908444299] [ROSWitmotionSensorController]: Entering SUSPENDED state
1683760901.9095328 [witmotion_ros_node-1] QObject::killTimer: Timers cannot be stopped from another thread
1683760901.9096880 [witmotion_ros_node-1] QObject::~QObject: Timers cannot be stopped from another thread
1683760901.9098196 [witmotion_ros_node-1] QSocketNotifier: Socket notifiers cannot be enabled or disabled from another thread
1683760901.9108186 [witmotion_ros_node-1] Suspending TTL connection, please emit RunPoll() again to proceed!
1683760902.0318766 [ERROR] [witmotion_ros_node-1]: process has died [pid 20855, exit code -11, cmd '/home/cmp/trot_ws/install/witmotion_ros/lib/witmotion_ros/witmotion_ros_node --ros-args --params-file /home/cmp/trot_ws/install/witmotion_ros/share/witmotion_ros/config/wt901.yml'].
User is member of dialout group and has permission to the device.
cmp@mele1:~/trot_ws$ ll /dev/ttyUSB1
crw-rw-rw- 1 root dialout 188, 1 May 11 09:12 /dev/ttyUSB1
cmp@mele1:~/trot_ws$ groups cmp
cmp : cmp adm dialout cdrom sudo dip plugdev lpadmin lxd sambashare
Correct port is selected. Other serial devices are working fine.
Not sure what else to try.
Managed to get it working, more or less. One issue was a combination of the device not being configured to output quarterions, and the parameter "use_native_orientation" being set to true.
But other big issue was choice of polling interval and output rate. I did not expect that the device would fail depending on these settings, until I read through "Test reports for ROS1 version on different sensors" #16 and saw how common this problem was.
My test results (only checking whether the ROS node would launch successfully and run for a minute or two; not testing whether it would remain working for hours).
OK ? | Baud | Output rate (Hz) | Polling Interval (ms) |
---|---|---|---|
:heavy_check_mark: | 115200 | 20 | 10 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 115200 | 20 | 20 |
:x: | 115200 | 20 | 50 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 115200 | 20 | 70 |
:x: | 115200 | 20 | 100 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 115200 | 50 | 10 |
:x: | 115200 | 50 | 20 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 115200 | 50 | 30 |
:x: | 115200 | 50 | 40 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 115200 | 50 | 50 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 115200 | 100 | 5 |
:x: | 115200 | 100 | 10 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 115200 | 100 | 15 |
:x: | 115200 | 100 | 20 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 115200 | 100 | 25 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 115200 | 100 | 30 |
It appears that the node will fail if the output rate is a multiple of the polling interval (eg 20 Hz and 50 ms, or 20 Hz and 100 ms).
Is this an issue with the driver code, or the device itself? It does not provide much confidence to use the devices in moving equipment....
@gsokoll in this case it seemed to be a serial port kernel driver issue because the node crashes only in one of the following cases:
In your case it seemed the kernel driver periodically hangs up filling the buffer and it may pass some poller firing moments. I can suggest to experiment with lower baudrates (primarily setting the proper baudrate on the device using official control application or one of the example control applications included in the driver library)
I doubt very much this is a kernel driver issue, but will do some more testing.
I have tested further with various baud rates. The behaviour is very consistent - when the polling interval matches the output rate interval, the node fails immediately when starting with "Sensor error: Timed out waiting for data, please check device connection and baudrate!"
OK ? | Baud | Output rate (Hz) | Polling Interval (ms) |
---|---|---|---|
:heavy_check_mark: | 57600 | 20 | 10 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 57600 | 20 | 20 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 57600 | 20 | 40 |
:x: | 57600 | 20 | 50 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 57600 | 20 | 70 |
:x: | 57600 | 20 | 100 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 19200 | 20 | 10 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 19200 | 20 | 20 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 19200 | 20 | 40 |
:x: | 19200 | 20 | 50 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 19200 | 20 | 70 |
:x: | 19200 | 20 | 100 |
:x: | 9600 | 20 | 10 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 9600 | 20 | 20 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 9600 | 20 | 40 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 9600 | 20 | 50 |
:heavy_check_mark: | 9600 | 20 | 70 |
:x: | 9600 | 20 | 100 |
Even when the choosing a "good" set of output rate and polling intervals, the node would not reliabkly run for an extended period of time. For example, with baud rate of 115200, output rate of 20 Hz, and polling interval of 40 ms, the node would start successfully but testing repeatedly it ran for the following periods of time before failing with the same timeout error as before: 4 hrs, 1 min 1 hr, 17 mins 21 mins 1 hr, 48 mins
Fix for Timeout Errors Further examination of the source code indicates the timeout error is due to faulty logic in the read data function. Changes to address this issue has been tested and the code runs reliably for more than 12 hours in every case. Refer to https://github.com/ElettraSciComp/witmotion_IMU_ros/pull/26 | OK ? | Baud | Output rate (Hz) | Polling Interval (ms) |
---|---|---|---|---|
:heavy_check_mark: | 115200 | 20 | 10 | |
:heavy_check_mark: | 115200 | 20 | 20 | |
:heavy_check_mark: | 115200 | 20 | 40 | |
:heavy_check_mark: | 115200 | 20 | 50 | |
:heavy_check_mark: | 115200 | 20 | 70 | |
:heavy_check_mark: | 115200 | 20 | 100 |
From my test for Yahboom 10-axis IMU. I got these topics to be published:
\imu
\magnetometer
\temperature
And these were the combinations that worked: (output rate presumably 200 Hz from the source's claim: https://category.yahboom.net/products/imu) I didn't change any settings for that.
OK? | Baud | Polling interval (ms) |
---|---|---|
✅ | 9600 | 0.5 |
✅ | 9600 | 1 |
✅ | 9600 | 5 |
✅ | 9600 | 10 |
✅ | 9600 | 20 |
✅ | 9600 | 30 |
✅ | 9600 | 40 |
✅ | 9600 | 50 |
✅ | 9600 | 60 |
✅ | 9600 | 70 |
✅ | 9600 | 100 |
✅ | 9600 | 200 |
❌ | 14400 | 20, 50, 100, 200 |
❌ | 38400, 921600, 115200 | 50 on each |
Apparently, only 9600 baud seem to work in my test (with the best of my testing ability and knowledge).
This issue is dedicated to place the test reports of ROS2 version of this driver. All contributors are encouraged to place the test reports they have for this driver on the different Witmotion sensors here. Please link here also the other issues containing test results and experience feedback under the following template:
ROS1 issue: #16