Closed Unrealluver closed 2 years ago
looking for your reply, thanks
Do you use some chatting apps like wechat? Could we talk about more detailed things on it?
thanks!
But I still have question that why the pseudo mask in foider ppmg_coco
mislead the class background
and people
in a very simple image 000000000036
? And I also checked other images that contain people, their psudo mask also labeled people area as '0'.
- 0 is background.
- label_map: https://tech.amikelive.com/node-718/what-object-categories-labels-are-in-coco-dataset/ (range from 0-91 with bg, only 81 classes are valid)
Thanks for the blog that truly helped me unstand the coco14
dataset! I noticed that the invalid classes' num in the blog is 11 and the valid classes contains 80 ones. So should we set the coco14
's class_num to 92 (80 valid foregrounds + 11 invalid classes + 1 background) to get the best CAM performence?
- 0 is background.
- label_map: https://tech.amikelive.com/node-718/what-object-categories-labels-are-in-coco-dataset/ (range from 0-91 with bg, only 81 classes are valid)
Thanks for the blog that truly helped me unstand the
coco14
dataset! I noticed that the invalid classes' num in the blog is 11 and the valid classes contains 80 ones. So should we set thecoco14
's class_num to 92 (80 valid foregrounds + 11 invalid classes + 1 background) to get the best CAM performence?
Sorry, I noticed that the last invalid is not need to be add. QAQ
Hi there! Your work is so awesome at the performence! I'd like to do something on it. But when I run the code you commited, I meet some question:
ppmg_coco
pseudo mask? I found that people and the background are all labeled as '0' in some pseudo masks like 000000000036.png.