Closed Tastaturtaste closed 10 months ago
Thanks for the quick fix for this issue. I confirmed it works with cargo install cargo-deny
(without --locked).
Can you tell me what the expected time frame is until this change is reflected in the cargo-deny-action?
Describe the bug
A comment in another issue describing the differing behaviour with context
In the PR linked above, I use
cargo tree -i intel-mkl-src --all-features -e "no-dev,features"
to see if there is a non-dev-dependency onintel-mkl-src
, which has a license I don't want to introduce.resolver = "1"
in the workspaceintel-mkl-src
is present due to feature unification with a dev-dependencyresolver = "2"
in the workspace it is not present anymore (which is what I want)However
cargo deny --log-level error --all-features --exclude-dev check licenses
still complains aboutintel-mkl-src
regardless of the usedresolver
. I would expectcargo-deny
to use the same resolver cargo itself uses.To reproduce
resolver = "2"
in the workspaceCargo.toml
cargo tree -i intel-mkl-src --all-features -e "no-dev,features"
cargo deny --log-level error --all-features --exclude-dev check licenses
cargo-deny version
cargo-deny 0.14.3
What OS were you running cargo-deny on?
Windows
Additional context
If you need any more context or information please let me know.