Open lulf opened 4 years ago
In the shared infra design doc, the ability to create 'transactional' queues and topics are indicated by an array of capabilities on the MessagingPlan:
kind: MessagingPlan
spec:
capabilities:
- transactional
In addition to enforcing this at the messaging plan, I wonder if it should be possible to specify this property on the MessagingTenant
as well. This allows making use of transactional addresses without having to create a MessagingPlan. It could be exposed like this:
kind: MessagingTenant
spec:
# For user setting the capability
capabilities:
- transactional
status:
# The capabilities as inferred by the operator, either based on plan or on the setting in the spec.
capabilities:
- transactional
Question 1: Should it be possible to override the plan in the MessagingTenant
?
If a MessagingTenant
has the transactional capability, the MessagingAddress
controller can:
I think the simplest way to implement this in the operator is to create this link route when the first address is created belonging to a tenant with transactional capability is created. Once that address has been scheduled, the operator can then know what parameters the linkRoute should have.
Question 2: Does this sufficiently cover the use cases of a JMS/Transactional broker? I.e. do we need to allow clients to use this virtual broker without any addresses configured?
@k-wall @rgodfrey Any concerns/comments to this?
Description
Add support for all address types.
Tasklist