codecov[bot] commented 2 years ago

Codecov Report

Merging #669 (d7dd6ec) into main (11c5469) will increase coverage by 5.53%. The diff coverage is 65.85%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #669      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   20.20%   25.73%   +5.53%     
==========================================
  Files          36      113      +77     
  Lines         490     1496    +1006     
  Branches       16      166     +150     
==========================================
+ Hits           99      385     +286     
- Misses        388     1082     +694     
- Partials        3       29      +26

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit-dotnet	`?`
unit-python	`?`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...tions.Infrastructure/Messaging/MessageExtractor.cs	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
...tener/MarketRoles/EnergySupplierChangedListener.cs	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
...ngPoint/ConsumptionMeteringPointCreatedListener.cs	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
...er/MeteringPoint/MeteringPointConnectedListener.cs	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
...b.Aggregations.IntegrationEventListener/Program.cs	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
...ator.Application/Coordinator/CoordinatorService.cs	`50.00% <ø> (ø)`
...Coordinator.Application/Utilities/EnumExtension.cs	`50.00% <ø> (ø)`
...dinator.Application/Utilities/InputStringParser.cs	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
...inator.Application/Utilities/NodatimeExtensions.cs	`100.00% <ø> (ø)`
...gregation.Coordinator.DatabaseMigration/Program.cs	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
... and 139 more

:mega: Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

BjarkeMeier commented 2 years ago

@djorgensendk, how about the required checks. They are not enabled and tests are failing in this PR. Should we activate the required checks and thus blocking this PR or what do you think?