Open InleEfrafa opened 8 months ago
Yes. If you are just looking to project a given density or velocity profile, you'll want to assume the hydrostatic modes. That is effectively like setting k=0.
That makes sense, thank you. Would I then be correct in assuming that to get the displacement I just integrate wrt t, which is the same as multipling by the frequency and shifting the phase by pi/2? Then the standard integral to get RMS displacement(z) seems to be to integrate the sum of the displacement modes wrt w (omega).
It depends on the particular dynamical variable you're interested in, and whether you're interested in waves or geostrophic motions. Check out equations 6 and 9 for the correct usage.
Does that answer your question?
Do you have any guidance for the constant value of K to choose for the EVP whilst attempting to determine RMS values for vertical for a given stratification profile?
Many thanks