Closed barbarian1803 closed 1 week ago
Hi @barbarian1803
Would you mind sharing the full vep command you ran to get these results - thanks!
Just realized the VEP for RefSeq accommodate the transcript correction and the diff is coming from that correction.
Describe the issue
There are some differences between cDNA length for RefSeq transcript when using downloaded merged cache compared to the genbank. One of the transcript is NR_038327.2
Additional information
Running vep with --total_length parameter. For this variant:
chr21 9068792 . T G . mapping_quality;non_homref_normal;no_reliable_supporting_read;weak_evidence DP=479;MQ=20.88;FractionInformativeReads=1.000;SoftClipRatio=0.00 GT:SQ:AD:AF:F1R2:F2R1:DP:SB:MB 0/0:0.00:84,12:0.1250:39,5:45,7:96:.:. 0/1:11.61:222,67:0.2318:124,35:98,32:289:85,137,36,31:105,117,32,35
One of the refseq annotation is:
1|non_coding_transcript_exon_variant|MODIFIER|TEKT4P2|100132288|Transcript|NR_038327.2|transcribed_pseudogene|4/4||NR_038327.2:n.1177A>C||1177/1613|||||||-1||EntrezGene|HGNC:40046|||||RefSeq||T|T|OK|||||chr21:g.9068792T>G|||||||||
It is shown that the variant position ofr the cDNA is 1177/1613. This means that the cDNA length for this transcript is 1613. If we check it from the genebank the length is 1617.System