Open cmungall opened 7 years ago
hmm, CHEBI doesn't seem very consistent here; lithium ME only has one direct subclass; ions are in a different branch
is_a CHEBI:33296 ! alkali metal molecular entity
is_a CHEBI:33298 ! lithium molecular entity ***
is_a CHEBI:35478 ! lithium salt
is_a CHEBI:30142 ! lithium tetrahydroaluminate
is_a CHEBI:30525 ! lithium nitride
is_a CHEBI:48607 ! lithium chloride
is_a CHEBI:51753 ! Alexa Fluor 480
is_a CHEBI:52661 ! Alexa Fluor 488
is_a CHEBI:52662 ! Alexa Fluor 488 para-isomer
is_a CHEBI:52663 ! Alexa Fluor 488 meta-isomer
is_a CHEBI:63042 ! lithium bromide
is_a CHEBI:63315 ! lithium nitrate
is_a CHEBI:64735 ! lithium citrate (anhydrous)
is_a CHEBI:6504 ! lithium carbonate
Filed a ticket for these: https://github.com/ebi-chebi/ChEBI/issues/3336
When we say exposure to {caesium, lead, mercury, copper, ...} do we mean
X molecular entity
etc
it seems safest to opt for the most general (
X molecular entity
), and if we need more specific subforms, add more specific classes.some examples:
may not be sufficient to classify radioactive isotopes