Open kaiiam opened 3 years ago
I don't think this belongs in either
@cmungall should this be in COB instead?
no, it's not upper level.
In GO we mint a taxon_union namespace which is terrible as it doesn't resolve
we need a new namespace and sync this with ncbitaxon releases and use the go union patterns
I'd be interested in trying to help with this effort @cmungall can you direct me to these go union patterns?
anyway, deprecate in envo and close this for now
@cmungall perhaps we can deprecate in ENVO once we have something to replace it by. I'd prefer not to leave downstream projects without a term in the interim.
@kaiiam agreed, also agreed it's a strange one.
Let's deprecate and add replaced by as you suggested. If there's downstream work to do in deprecating those, it can happen in PCO/ECOCORE
Following @pbuttigieg's suggestion for now will be possible once PCO has made it's next release @ramonawalls please let me know when you do so, such that I can import it here.
@ramonawalls in https://github.com/PopulationAndCommunityOntology/pco/issues/58 created the new term: alga excluding Cyanobacteria to replace envo: alga. Also xref https://github.com/EcologicalSemantics/ecocore/issues/100.
Unless @pbuttigieg has any objections, should we precede to deprecate and replace by?