During the SONet Lake workshop (2015-06-04), it was stated that most classification systems are based on fairly standard textbook knowledge
"What's in the water"
Trophic status
Oxygenation
Salinity
Carbonate concentration
Ecological communities or presence/absence of invasive
Potability
"the lake itself"
Mixing regime (mostly done)
Lake origin
Permanence
Connectivity
Lake use ([used for, suitable for] recreation, hydropower, flood control) link to ecosystem
Management regime
Spill point, elevation of the spillway (for reservoirs)
conservation pool elevation
elevation
depth
size
water residence time
Interestingly, morphometry not used for classification very often, but it is used.
convex vs concave
"around and encompassing the lake"
climate zone / environmental conditions
land use /land cover
catchment area or catchment area to lake area ratio
soil types, geological features
rainfall
buffer zone vs watershed
During the SONet Lake workshop (2015-06-04), it was stated that most classification systems are based on fairly standard textbook knowledge
"What's in the water" Trophic status Oxygenation Salinity Carbonate concentration Ecological communities or presence/absence of invasive Potability
"the lake itself" Mixing regime (mostly done) Lake origin Permanence Connectivity Lake use ([used for, suitable for] recreation, hydropower, flood control) link to ecosystem Management regime Spill point, elevation of the spillway (for reservoirs) conservation pool elevation elevation depth size water residence time Interestingly, morphometry not used for classification very often, but it is used. convex vs concave
"around and encompassing the lake" climate zone / environmental conditions land use /land cover catchment area or catchment area to lake area ratio soil types, geological features rainfall buffer zone vs watershed