Open nlharris opened 5 years ago
@nlharris : The description of "Change relationship" doesn't really make sense : there can only be one relationship between a subclass and its superclass. Please don't add that to ENVO unless it's updated.
I think this should be split into "Change superclass" and "Change subclass axioms".
This relates to the comment on logical definition. A logical definition is encoded only as an equivalence axiom, and is separate from the restrictions in the subclass axiom slot.
We also map a lot of our terms to other resources like SWEET and the NERC VS. Suggest adding a "Map to external terminology resource" issue type . This should request an IRI to the target term and the ORCID of the submitter.
@pbuttigieg I edited some of the template names and labels based on your feedback. If you can take a look at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PreQFDKKLUcY7sMK-hC5o9egPTx1LgTK1PnstTbZ_yM/edit and accept/reject my changes, I can set up the issue templates.
The doc looks good
Also see the mondo templates https://github.com/monarch-initiative/mondo/issues/new/choose
some are obv disease specific but others can be generalized
Is this still something that is wanted?
See discussion in https://github.com/INCATools/ontology-development-kit/issues/162 See proposed template names and labels here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PreQFDKKLUcY7sMK-hC5o9egPTx1LgTK1PnstTbZ_yM/edit