Closed bhazelton closed 4 years ago
@nicholebarry can you look at this one too?
It appears that something is off in the noise ration for the kpar=0 bin, but that is true in master as well. Nothing jumps out at me in code as a mistake there, but I'll keep looking.
Nichole suggested replacing the standard power transform with just not rotating the cosine & sine modes to keep this code closer to the default Lomb-Scargle approach.
Closing this in favor of an approach suggested by @nicholebarry to keep the code more aligned: just don't rotate between sin & cos modes for standard power (i.e. set the rotation angle to zero).
Also drop uv pixels with less than 1/3 of the frequencies as we do in the Lomb-Scargle case.
closes #91