Open XingdaChen1996 opened 8 months ago
Hi,
Indeed the tonality from ECMA 418-2 is currently lacking in MOSQITO. We are currently working on the roughness from ECMA 418-2, and the tonality was supposed to come after, so we'd be very happy to review your implementation :) This metric would be very useful for all MOSQITO users, thanks for your contribution !
Don't hesitate to share your fork if you need some help with the implementation...
Salomé
Hi everyone,
i am currently working on a students project to port a licenced sound quality calculation to open source and will need the HMS Tonality. Where can i find your current progress on ECMA 418-2? I would like to take up the challenge of contributing this part to the open source project. Your work, until now, already saved a ton of time.
Thanks for your reply and the best wishes from Germany
Benny
Hi,
I am a PhD student and in my research I am working on the sound of pumps, which is very tonal. For me it would also be very interesting to know when I can expect the tonality to be included in the package.
Thank you in advance! Matthias
I only found the tr/pr sound quality metric, but not the tonality (hearing model) sound quality metric. Which is the best sound quality metric in tr/pr/tonality (hearing model)? If tonality (hearing model) is useful, I am going to write the python code of tonality (hearing model) recently and upload it to MoSQITo Library. Hope to get your reply as soon as possible.